Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

Romans 12:19 (King James Version)

I don’t believe in capital punishment. The idea of killing someone to as punishment for killing someone is ass backwards logic. This is my opinion but it’s not a popular one. Thiry-two states not including the United States government and military disagree. I am happy that my home state abolished the death penalty in 2013.

Whenever I have discussions regarding my stance of the death penalty the same retort always surfaces in a hypothetical situation is placed before to see if my opinion would waver. “What if a guy killed your parents in front of you? I bet you would want them to die for what they did.” My response is always and unequivocally “No.” While I couldn’t possibly begin to understand the range of emotions one feels from having a loved one murdered in cold blood; I would like to think that my humanity includes the ability to forgive.

Even under the most sophisticated death penalty statutes, race continues to play a major role in determining who shall live and who shall die. -Justice Harry Blackmun, 1994

I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that I’m a Black man (I believe most people reading this already knew) so I can’t help but look at how race plays a part in handing down the death penalty. You’re probably thinking well “If someone is convicted of murder then what difference what race they are?” Whites are less likely to be sentenced to die when convicted of similar crimes in the same states. In some states judges can override a jury’s recommendation of life in prison without the possibility of parole and impose the death penalty.

Prosecutors not only decide who should be charged with a particular level of offense, they also have a significant impact on the way the trial is conducted. When a prosecutor refers to a Hispanic defendant as “a chili-eating bastard,” as happened in a Colorado death penalty case, it sets a tone of acceptance of racial prejudice for the entire trial. Similarly, the selection of juries is an essential part of this process, and some prosecutors have made a practice of eliminating blacks from their prospective juries, thereby increasing the likelihood of a race-based decision. More than ninety-eight percent of District Attorneys in death penalty states are white.

Everyone who looks at a ticking clock knowing that their life has a countable number of days will always proclaim their innocence. What if that one person who actually is innocent is put to death? What does that say about the system? It wasn’t until the execution of Troy Davis that I became interested in this country’s fascination with the death penalty.  The following (You can click his name to read the details of his case) are his last words.

Well, first of all I’d like to address the MacPhail family. I’d like to let you all know that despite the situation — I know all of you still are convinced that I’m the person that killed your father, your son and your brother, but I am innocent. The incidents that happened that night was not my fault. I did not have a gun that night. I did not shoot your family member.

But I am so sorry for your loss. I really am — sincerely.

All that I can ask is that each of you look deeper into this case, so that you really will finally see the truth.

I ask to my family and friends that you all continue to pray, that you all continue to forgive. Continue to fight this fight.

For those about to take my life, may God have mercy on all of your souls. God bless you all.

These words spoken by Davis along with the circumstances of a man who is guilty of the crime for which he was put to death. As he said “God have mercy on all our souls.

From 2000-2005 in the United States there were twenty-two death row convictions overturned due to official misconduct. This includes four overturned convictions in 2003 in Illinois based on tortured confessions.  If there is a possibility that one innocent life can be wrongly taken then that is enough for me not to believe in the system of punishment.

If moral convictions or the possibility of executing innocent people doesn’t convince some that the death penalty is wrong then perhaps appealing to people’s frugal side will. There have been numerous state-commissioned studies that show pursuing in a death penalty case in place of life in prison costs the more than a million dollars per case. A Nevada study stated “Adjudicating death penalty cases takes more time and resources compared to murder cases where the death penalty sentence is not pursued as an option. These cases are more costly because there are procedural safeguards in place to ensure the sentence is just and free from error.”

From Equal Justice USA:

Many people believe that the death penalty is more cost-effective than housing and feeding a prisoner for life. But the death penalty’s complexity, length, and finality drive costs through the roof, making it much more expensive. In reality, capital punishment is an inefficient, bloated program that has bogged down law enforcement, delayed justice for victims’ families, and devoured millions of crime-fighting dollars that could save lives and protect the public.

With all of the reading and compiling of information for this post that I’ve done I asked myself my own hypothetical question. “If I was looking down from heaven (or up from hell- God is not done with me yet) and I could cast my vote on the recommendation for sentencing of my murderer, what would I recommend?” Deep in my soul I know I would recommend life in prison. It’s easy to debate death in abstract but the intentional killing of a human being who poses no immediate danger to us is an act I believe few have the nerve to do. So could you pull the switch?

 

10 Responses to On my moral contention to capital punishment.

  1. […] On my moral contention to capital punishment. Read it here. […]

  2. Mildred says:

    Although anger will make me want to reach for the switch, but pulling the switch is too easy. I’d rather have the person’s freedom taken away–that’s more logical. And hopefully while him/her is in prison their conscience alone will do the killing–that’s if they have one.

    • tunde says:

      so you’d actually pull the switch yourself? you’d be ok with taking a human life?

      “And hopefully while him/her is in prison their conscience alone will do the killing–that’s if they have one.”

      people would be surprised how many people repent once spending time in prison.

      • Mildred says:

        My ultimate decision is not to pull the switch, because that will not necessarily bring me any satisfaction. I think keeping the person alive in solitary is a better route. I hope I’m never faced with such tribulation though.

  3. Rachael says:

    I think the death penalty provides an easy way out. It eliminates the punishment. I feel that it’s comparable, although not as severe, to being in trouble as a child. You could take the whooping or be grounded. Once the whooping was over, so was the punishment but being grounded had a lasting effect.

  4. I’ve recently asked myself similar questions thanks to “The Walking Dead” and although I’m sure I’ve been desensitized because of it, I would NOT pull the switch. But only because I do not believe in the system. Never have, never will.

    However, if I were confronted with the scenario that you mentioned, where my family members were murdered in cold blood, I would not hesitate to pull my OWN switch.

    Unfortunately, I have lost faith in humanity a long time ago. There are events that have occurred in my life that has caused me to think and act less… humanly. At a certain point, I learned that hesitation and emotion at the wrong moment could be a deadly mistake. Now I know I sound crazy, understand that I am a generally sweet person (LOL). But everything in life is circumstantial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.
close